Ringswell Round Up March 4th
Eastleigh – what a result! Steve Webb telling us
on Friday about his two days down there campaigning and how he and others of
similar ilk got up at 2.55am on Thursday morning to deliver polling day leaflets
in 5am dark. He managed to get back to London in time for his first of three
pensions events at 10am.
Rennard – more practice on learning
how to add my voice to a debate without sounding like I think I know the
solution. Hope the systems in place will produce a just result, whatever that
happens to be. See a need for a re-think on how to tackle this
issue and help both sides understand each other better – will be interesting to
see if we manage to make that space, at least within the party.
Education – interesting debate in Bristol on
Saturday afternoon. Only signs of political correctness around food in schools,
otherwise seemed to be a reasonable range of views and some refreshing thinking from
schools and NUT reps. Came away feeling there is hope yet - a very welcome
change from the doom and gloom one gets from the media about state education. One
chap in audience asked whether we couldn’t assume that qualifications made
well-rounded individuals – couldn’t let that one go by, leads me to my rant of the
day on measurement below.
I liked another point made by the NUJ rep: he’d
been asked recently what could be done to import the DNA of the private system
into the state sector, to which his response was, we don’t need your DNA, just your
resources.
Measuring human beings – the assumption that
there’s is a direct correlation between academic achievement and well-rounded
individuals feels so wrong it’s danger to my heart rate. It ties in with
Rennard and politics generally as well as education: just because we don’t have a yardstick for
measuring human qualities like empathy, insight, humour, courage and common sense doesn’t
make the things we can measure, like how many facts you know about history or
how good your maths is in exam conditions, more important. I still want to know
how good GCSE maths helps people look after babies.
Energy Bill – much discussion in Green LibDems
over the weekend on our approach to Tim Yeo’s (Conservative Chair of the
Climate Change Committee) amendment to include a decarbonisation target. Interesting
to see the different arguments brought to the table.I'm changing my comment of "Not much chance of
the amendment succeeding" to apparently every hope of the amendment succeeding - depending on who you read - but agreed it
was important LibDem MPs felt able to support it so Emergency Motion to
Conference being proposed. Tim Farron
(party president) also supporting a target. Perhaps another lesson in
government about working in coalition. Would LibDem support for the
amendment undermine Ed Davey in any future negotiations in government? ie he
can’t demonstrate that he can bring the party along with him when making a
concession. But then, it’s a cross party amendment, proposed by a Conservative –
George Osborne equally unable to bring his party along with him, on a point he had
won.
No comments:
Post a Comment